EssentialPIM 12.0 Release Candidate Now Available!

[a8907433]

For point number 4 - there's an option to bypass spam filtering for senders from your contact list.

Of Course I checked this option. But I have Astonsoft not on my contact list! So how could I set emails which are not on my contact list not to be spam?
This is exactly how it should work: mark senders (put on contact list) > contact list senders are not spam. The only problem you have to solve is, you should additionally let mark senders to a "not spam" list, which works the same as contact list.

There are many senders which you don´t want to be a contact, for example newsletters AND you nevertheless want to be NOT spam!

A simple positive IS SPAM and negative IS NOT SPAM list!

[admin]

locke, you mean you would prefer the details view to be non-editable by default unless users click on the Edit button, for instance? While we could make that adjustment, I'm not certain how well-received it would be by our users?

a8907433, we see your point. However, there is currently no such mechanism in EPIM. The existing system, where users train their spam filter by marking spam emails as spam and non-spam emails in the spam folder as not spam, generally works well for the majority of users.

[locke]

locke, you mean you would prefer the details view to be non-editable by default unless users click on the Edit button, for instance? While we could make that adjustment, I'm not certain how well-received it would be by our users?

Wenn Felder in der Vorschau ergänzt oder gelöscht werden, müssen diese auf jeden Fall über "Bearbeiten" Funktion ergänzt werden, da dies über die Vorschau nicht möglich ist. In der Vorschau werden aktuell Änderungen gespeichert, obwohl ich diese nicht mit "Speichern" bestätige. Wie das andere User sehen kann ich natürlich nicht beurteilen. Aktuell besteht die Gefahr, dass durch Falscheingaben Werte ohne "Speichern" wirksam werden.

Gruß
Locke

[admin]

Thank you, your suggestion is clear, we will certainly think about it.

Regarding the risk of unexpectedly changing some data, please note that if you have the version history enabled, you will always be able to revert back to any of the previous stages for an item.

[locke]

Thank you, your suggestion is clear, we will certainly think about it.

Danke für Ihre Prüfung!

Regarding the risk of unexpectedly changing some data, please note that if you have the version history enabled, you will always be able to revert back to any of the previous stages for an item.

Dieser Rollback ist aber nur machbar, wenn die Funktion aktiviert ist und wenn der Fehler bemerkt wird.

Gruß
Locke

[a8907433]

a8907433, we see your point. However, there is currently no such mechanism in EPIM. The existing system, where users train their spam filter by marking spam emails as spam and non-spam emails in the spam folder as not spam, generally works well for the majority of users.

On clicking "create rule from message" there is the option: "Do not apply spam filtering"?
This in just one click option- wouldn´t this have the same effect as clicking "is not spam" the next time a mail from this sender comes?

[admin]

Nope, these are completely different mechanisms. The first option instructs EPIM to strictly bypass spam filtering for the messages that meet the rule conditions. On the other hand, the second option trains the spam filter by providing it with data, enhancing its precision over time.

[Simon_W]

Trying to print labels for Christmas however I am no able to load a label template. Not the ones I used in the past and not any other one I try? This is on version 12.1.1 build 1017

[memarten]

Also trying to print labels. No label templates available. Using version 12.1.1 build 1017.

[locke]

I can confirm that.

[admin]

This issue will be addressed in the upcoming minor update of EPIM, scheduled for release in a couple of days. Thank you for bringing it to our attention!